- 
		
			2. I use a cool portfolio visualization tool called @PersonalCapital to let me see what’s going on with my various investments and compares to benchmarks👇. Wait a second! Even though the S&P 500 *index* fell 6.2% last year, those stocks paid about 1.8% in dividends. R≈-4.4%!
- 
		
			3. I started to worry that @PersonalCapital was benchmarking *returns* against a *price change*. You can imagine why an advisor¹ might want to set themselves up for an unfair fight by ignoring stocks’ ~1.9% div yield. ¹I don’t use PC for advice, just viz. @lukestein/1112947221115232256
- 
		
			4. But the story has a happy (?) ending: @PersonalCapital apparently *also ignores dividends in calculating MY performance* 🤦♂️ Comparing this to SPX is a (rotten) apples-to-(rotten) apples comparison. And PC is implicitly penalizing premium bonds and high-DY stocks.
- 
		
			5/5. It’s not always easy to get finance right. (Even personal finance. Especially personal finance?) It’s not easy to get UX right. But as a producer or consumer of personal finance data, you should know what your data is, and think about the pitfalls of misinterpretation.
- 
		
			Return ≠ price change bonus tweet, now with ∞% more animated gifs!
- 
		
			Arithmetic average ≥ geometric average, animated gif edition
 lukestein’s Twitter Archive—№ 2,114
lukestein’s Twitter Archive—№ 2,114




