lukestein’s avatarlukestein’s Twitter Archive—№ 4,880

    1. Ok, friends. My Twitter “drafts” are a mess, but some of them spark joy. So… this is going to be a long, self-indulgent thread of random tweets I didn’t post for some reason but don’t quite feel like deleting. 1/N
      oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
  1. …in reply to @lukestein
    Thanks, but I’m good
    oh my god twitter doesn’t include alt text from images in their API
    1. …in reply to @lukestein
      Should you get a tattoo inspired by the last three-word phrase of this👇🏻 tweet? The answer is… @econabstracts/1182726199333789704
      1. …in reply to @lukestein
        “Tom thinks that the best method of teaching anything is to rely on discussion in class, which means letting twenty young blockheads and two cocky neurotics discuss for fifty minutes something that neither their teacher nor they know.” — Pnin, V. Nabokov
        1. …in reply to @lukestein
          Unpopular opinion: ≠ ≻ != ≻ <> ≻ =/=
          1. …in reply to @lukestein
            If you feel like tweeting but don’t know what to post, my suggestion is either (1) don’t or (2) amplify a grad student whose work/twitter you admire
            1. …in reply to @lukestein
              This strategy for structuring a fundraising pitch should also work for teaching or presenting, more broadly. Fundamentally, all these activities are about motivated communication. @BabsonEship/1176609244466094083
              1. …in reply to @lukestein
                <insert Mark Enamill joke here> @LeCreusetSA/1179999700616978432
                1. …in reply to @lukestein
                  Considering writing an exam question about this tweet (by the author of “Big Mistakes: The Best Investors and Their Worst Investments”) @michaelbatnick/1187783929731964928
                  1. …in reply to @lukestein
                    “The animals are worth around $6,000 each. And since these were breeding bulls, hundreds of thousands of dollars' worth of future calves were lost too.” 🤔 @NPR/1181842248796921856
                    1. …in reply to @lukestein
                      Dear conference organizers, this is how to do name tags: 𝗕𝗶𝗴, 𝗯𝗼𝗹𝗱, legible names t.co/JQ6KSzkaNJ
                      1. …in reply to @lukestein
                        Great thread👇 on @NicolaLimodio’s awesome “every mushroom cloud has a silver lining” paper @benmarrow/1180140772387168256
                        1. …in reply to @lukestein
                          This is the one, folks. All I’d add is that affirmative answers to Jamin’s suggested questions are complements: You’re more likely to like people whose values/priorities you share, which means their happiness is a better predictor of yours. t.co/SmeE8UjFGU
                          1. …in reply to @lukestein
                            This, but the job market wiki hosted on EJMR @drNYCnerd/1188578953063288834
                            1. …in reply to @lukestein
                              This, but for empirical asset pricing factors @machinepix/1171193390718803968
                              1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                My daughter’s excitement telling us all about a book she read at school today—“Why Wheat”—suggests the soybean lobbyists have a *lot* of catching up to do with the kindergarten crowd 🌾
                                1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                  Favorite thing overheard at a recent conference: “Hold on a minute: I have a strong opinion consistent with what you just said.”
                                  1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                    This but instead of songs, half-joking IV strategies @AskBabaDog/1173806473274679298
                                    1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                      When the strategy scholars tell the accounting scholars they may want to talk to their marketing colleagues… @sasridharan/1111667048311074819
                                      1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                        “In 2005, Trump said he received a $17 million insurance payment for hurricane damage to the [Mar-a-Lago] resort, but an Associated Press investigation found little evidence of such large-scale damage.” @GeorgeTakei/1167516675257843713
                                        1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                          “Their sleek promotional materials scream ‘Instagrammable Friends episode…,’ or perhaps just ‘Coke commercial sponsored by Wayfair.’ Their roots, however, lie someplace older and grubbier: the low-budget single room occupancy hotels, or SROs, of the early 20th century.” @sarahsholder/1137016359836049409
                                          1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                            “I’d love to add any citations or consider any additional tests you have in mind. We’ll do it now so things are easier for you when you’re refereeing the paper later.”
                                            1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                              Motivated reasoning > rational expectations @fmanjoo/1123595713298853889
                                              1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                                This (reality) is messed up and I’m incredibly privileged in SO many ways. Though I admit: motivated curiosity about the research backing up (3). @PhDisillusion/1121438817435693061
                                                1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                                  “Degrees of freedom”’s just another word for “something left to lose” @nihilist_ds/1102622899356069888
                                                  1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                                    My kids are still little, but if they ever fail a class I’ll fully expect them to write a counterreport card while I raid the whiskey stockpile and order pizza. @rebeccaballhaus/1117424425786277891
                                                    1. …in reply to @lukestein
                                                      And… continued next week! @lukestein/1193178833651826689