lukestein’s avatarlukestein’s Twitter Archive—№ 11,183

  1. …in reply to @startupecon
    @startupecon 100% agree. Given the data’s release, should we not be analyzing/discussing it publicly given that some people will draw the wrong inference? Also fwiw I think the top issues with the disclosure are (1) the ability for particular referees to be unmasked, and
    On twitter.com Twitter logo lukestein’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +3 🙂
    1. …in reply to @lukestein
      @startupecon (2) the fact that authors of accepted papers can now rule out 100s of potential referees as having ref’d their paper. This harms low-volume referees who benefit from the goodwill that comes from assumed possibility that they were a positive referee.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo lukestein’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets Mood +6 🙂
      1. …in reply to @lukestein
        @startupecon But I take the point (not just yours) that it’s best not posted.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo lukestein’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets Mood +3 🙂